The RBI’s October minutes reveal an uncomfortable gap between its inflation diagnosis and its policy language. Governor Sanjay Malhotra and Deputy Governor Poonam Gupta backed the 25-basis-point increase in the repo rate to 5.50%. Both acknowledge a deteriorating outlook, but their language about subsequent tightening offers little assurance about the tightening needed to return inflation to 4%.

Malhotra notes that the share of the CPI basket experiencing inflation above 4% rose to 37% in August from 20% in March. He expects core inflation excluding precious metals to move above target. Yet he describes this as a “normalisation of inflation from the benign levels seen earlier”. That formulation understates the significance of price pressures spreading while underlying inflation is expected to exceed target.

Gupta places considerable weight on inflation approaching the 6% upper tolerance limit. She recalls policy action when inflation has reached or breached the tolerance boundaries, then says it is “conceivable that a further increase in the policy rate might be needed”. This gives the ceiling greater prominence in the justification for action than the distance from the 4% target.

She recognises monetary policy lags and supports acting before definitive evidence of generalisation emerges. That makes her tentative language about subsequent tightening more striking. If policy must anticipate inflation becoming entrenched, the commitment to correcting a persistent overshoot should carry more conviction than the suggestion that another increase is conceivable.

The forecasts reinforce that concern.

Inflation is projected at 6% in October–December 2026, 5.7% in January–March 2027 and 5.6% in April–June 2027. The final projection remains 1.6 percentage points above target. The minutes explain why rates should rise now more clearly than how inflation is expected to return to 4%, or what pace of convergence the RBI considers acceptable.

Deputy Governor Gupta also sees “insignificant signs” of supply shocks becoming entrenched or impacting inflation expectations. Yet the RBI’s Monetary Policy Report records rural and semi-urban households’ one-year inflation expectations rising by 50 basis points to 7.9% in September, continuing an upward trend since January.

Four or Six?
The growth assessment gives the RBI room to act decisively.

The forecast for 2026–27 has been raised to 7.1% from 6.7%. Malhotra also flags risks of demand pressures from expanding monetary and credit aggregates. Those conditions strengthen the case for continued action, yet the guidance remains more explicit about preserving flexibility than using it.

Considerable emphasis goes into explaining that calibrated tightening permits a pause. Perhaps to be read as more pauses than hikes.  One can expect a start-stop routine, although preserving discretion is understandable.

What remains unclear is how forcefully the RBI would respond if inflation stayed materially above 4% while remaining below 6%, and evidence of second-round effects remained inconclusive. That is precisely where the distinction between targeting inflation and respecting its tolerance band acquires practical meaning.

Some external members have already indicated they represent the growth-side of the argument.

Executive Director Indranil Bhattacharyya warned against “cautiousness bias”. 

His warnings offer little reassurance when the Governor and his deputy over-qualify the tightening path. Their language remains the more consequential guide to the institution’s intentions.

For those parsing every word of the RBI’s communication, these questions remain:

• Is “normalisation” an adequate description when headline inflation is projected to touch 6% and core inflation to exceed 4%?
• Does the emphasis on supply shocks understate demand pressures amid 7.8% first-quarter growth, strong credit expansion and buoyant consumption?
• How do the RBI’s revised growth and inflation forecasts square with its tentative language about further tightening?

Kevin Warsh remains a long way from delivering the Federal Reserve’s 2% inflation target, but his insistence on achieving it is relentless. Malhotra and Gupta’s own inflation diagnosis calls for the same conviction about 4%.   

Also Read
RBI is Forward-Looking About Growth, Not Inflation