Why RBI’s ECL Mandate Puts Banks on a New Prudential Frontier

India’s prudential regime enters its most consequential reset in two decades with the Reserve Bank of India’s October 2025 directive mandating that all banks adopt the Expected Credit Loss framework by April 2027. The move is not just an accounting reform but a regulatory pivot that redefines how risk, capital, and credit cycles interact in the Indian financial system.

By compelling banks to move from the Incurred Loss model to a forward-looking expected-loss approach, the central bank seeks to eliminate the structural weaknesses that have long amplified financial stress. 

The existing Income Recognition and Asset Classification norms focus narrowly on individual loan impairment after default, leaving the system exposed to cyclical volatility. 

The new model requires continuous risk recognition from loan origination, forcing banks to provision for future losses based on statistically modelled probabilities rather than past performance.

The timing carries its own significance. 

India lagged nearly seven years behind the global adoption of IFRS 9 standards introduced in 2018, perhaps because of customisation efforts and the RBI chose to align its transition with the next round of Basel III recalibrations due between 2025 and 2028. 

The change, therefore, positions India to synchronise its prudential architecture with emerging global standards, as regulators worldwide revisit the adequacy of post-crisis capital buffers.

Counter-Cyclical Intent
For a central bank that pioneered prudential banking norms as early as the 1990s through the Narasimham Committee reforms, the update was overdue. 

The previous system’s procyclicality has been well-documented. 

During credit booms, low provisioning requirements of 0.25% to 1% encourage aggressive lending without adequate buffers. When downturns arrive, the delayed recognition of losses leads to a sudden spike in provisions, compressing profitability and tightening credit precisely when the economy needs support.

The ECL framework seeks to reverse this cycle by embedding counter-cyclicality into regulation. It obliges banks to build reserves in good times when default probabilities are low, ensuring they enter downturns with sufficient loss-absorption capacity. In effect, it turns banks from amplifiers of stress into buffers of stability.

Risk Intelligence
Beyond cyclical smoothing, the reform also targets the long-standing opacity in asset quality measurement. The binary distinction between performing and non-performing assets after 90 days of delinquency ignores the gradations of credit deterioration. The ECL model introduces a three-stage classification system viz., performing, under stress, and credit-impaired, anchored in quantitative triggers such as 30-day delinquencies, income declines, or sectoral stress. This gives regulators a more nuanced picture of systemic vulnerability well before the crystallisation while compelling banks to act earlier on troubled exposures.

Perhaps the most significant shift is philosophical. 

Under the new model, risk assessment becomes continuous and data-driven, not a compliance ritual performed at quarter-end. The formula, probability of default multiplied by loss given default and exposure at default, places statistical modelling at the heart of credit governance. 

Banks will need to invest heavily in analytical infrastructure, scenario modelling, and data-quality systems capable of capturing macroeconomic linkages. RBI supervision, in turn, will evolve from checklist-based inspection to model validation and scenario governance.

Transition Challenge
Transitioning to this framework is not simple. 

India’s patchy default databases limited historical loss data for retail and SME segments, and uneven data integrity across banks pose serious modelling challenges. Smaller banks might need longer preparation timelines or differentiated treatment. The RBI indicated flexibility but made its intent clear: regulatory leniency would not be extended to those that lacked credible implementation plans.

The central bank’s phased approach, from the April 2027 rollout to complete provisioning alignment by March 2028, is designed to balance prudence with operational readiness. 

Banks with stressed portfolios or high non-performing assets would face sharper provisioning impacts, forcing either capital augmentation or accelerated resolution of legacy loans. Conversely, well-capitalised private lenders with advanced risk systems could treat ECL compliance as a competitive advantage, enhancing investor confidence through greater transparency.

Global Credibility
For the RBI, the benefits extend beyond domestic stability. Converging with global standards strengthens its credibility as a modern prudential regulator capable of enforcing consistent risk management frameworks. 

For investors and rating agencies, it improves the comparability of Indian banks’ balance sheets with international peers, potentially lowering funding costs and facilitating cross-border capital flows.

At a deeper level, the move reaffirms the RBI’s shift from reactive supervision, cleaning up balance sheets after crises, to proactive surveillance based on continuous risk anticipation. 

In a banking system still recovering from legacy bad loans and navigating rapid credit expansion, the ECL framework offers a forward-looking compass to detect trouble before it metastasises.

The reform’s success would ultimately depend on execution: the quality of models, integrity of data, and rigour of supervisory validation. Yet the direction of travel is unmistakable. India’s central bank has chosen foresight over forbearance, placing prudential vigilance at the core of financial governance. If implemented faithfully, the expected credit loss regime could redefine India’s banking resilience, bolstering both domestic financial stability and the credibility of Indian banks in global markets. 

BasisPoint Briefing — Explainers from seasoned practitioners for readers who want more than the basics.